“We are living in an age of extraordinary corporate power.”

When Brian Frush was sworn in as Maryland’s attorney general in 2015, Democrats probably didn’t expect to fight the organizers of his term. Beginner. But since 2017, Frosh and a few other Democratic attorneys general have taken Donald Trump’s administration to court on everything from Muslim travel bans to the return of environmental regulations.

Frosh has refused to run for a third term this year, and Democratic candidates in this blue state are keen to make him successful. One of them is Katie Curran O’Malley, a front-line visionary in Maryland politics. Her father, J. Joseph Quran Jr. has served as lieutenant governor of Maryland and has been the state’s longest-serving attorney general. Her husband, Martin O’Malley, served as governor from 2007 to 2015.

To become an AG, O’Malley, who has served as district judge for 20 years, must defeat Anthony Brown, who was her husband’s lieutenant governor, before being elected to Congress in the 2016 primary in the June 22 primary. If he wins, he will join a bipartisan group of attorney generals taking over corporate power.

Last month, O’Malley Unveiling His economic justice policy agenda. I spoke to him on April 7 about using the attorney general’s office to get corporate concentration.

This conversation has been edited and shortened for clarity

GB: When we talk about disbelief, I think most people look at Congress, at the Federal Trade Commission, at the judiciary. How can the state attorney general lead the fight against monopolies?

KO: Historically, that’s what states have done from Standard Oil. Now, we see that more and more AGs are banding together to go after Amazon, Facebook and Google.

My father, who was attorney general for 20 years, joined the tobacco case [Mississippi Attorney General] Mike Moore. The more states got into the real case, the stronger they became. This is why I think states are leaders in this regard.

We’re living in an age of extraordinary corporate power, and people aren’t really taking it seriously.

GB: There has been a movement to expand what is perceived as a standard of consumer welfare, and to look beyond what affects consumers or prices when evaluating whether a business practice is competitive. What kind of values ​​do you want to apply?

KO: When we look at competitive behavior, it’s not just about pricing and the impact on consumers. How it affects employees and if these corporations really care about employees. Amazon is one of the main culprits, but we also have Uber and Lyft and how they are misqualifying their employees. We need more legislation to protect not only consumers but also workers affected by these large companies.

GB: We are seeing a lot of creativity outside the state to take exclusive rights. Maryland is the first state to introduce a digital advertising tax. But we’ve seen statesmen like Dave Yost in Ohio. “Universal carrierThe law governing Google as a public entity or DC as Carl Resin Fetching A no-confidence motion against Amazon for pricing third-party vendors. If you are the Attorney General, do you have any innovative ideas to try to prevent monopoly?

KO: I support that AG and want to learn from their work. I’m curious to see if New York is able to pass 21st century antitrust laws because we want to abuse the dominance laws here in Maryland. This, of course, would extend the tools available to any AG in the event of an antitrust breach.

And impose higher criminal penalties. For many of these companies, it’s like, “Yeah, of course, give me a fine, but it won’t change my behavior.”

As the next AG, I would urge you to expand the laws that we can use and increase our distrust of lawyers. We have a huge consumer protection department and I want to see that we do more in antitrust enforcement.

GB: Most people look at disbelief and think of big tech, but there are worrying integrations in a lot of industries. What industries would you like to see up close in Maryland?

KO: We have problems with agricultural companies, not only because of their competitive practices but also because of what they have done for the environment. I believe in 2021, AG Frosh went behind Monsanto and got a big settlement due to the effects of chemicals in our Chesapeake Bay. Travel companies and airlines should also be considered. Pharmaceutical Companies: Due to the opioid crisis, we, along with other AGs, have joined hands with Purdue Pharma and the Saclar family in a consumer protection measure. We also notice big hospital integration.

GB: In terms of cooperation, there has been a significant bilateral overlap between state AGs in the acquisition of exclusive rights, especially in investigations and lawsuits against Facebook and Google. Why are you the best candidate for that bipartisan endeavor?

KO: My 30 years in those first 10 state attorney’s offices and then 20 years as a judge আমি I’ve been able to act as a mediator on many issues. And even as a prosecutor, it’s not just about putting someone in jail. It has worked across the board to work on resolving and having an attorney general who was in the courtroom, to decide as a judge and to mediate cases. I think I am the best person for this because I have gained years of experience in the courtroom.

GB: Many people think of it as the second guilded age, it has the potential to be a second progressive era, and these organizations take on the task of disbelief. How do you see the transition to state AG opportunities in the next five to 10 years?

KO: I think it’s a really, really good opportunity because everyone can go after it. The last decade has seen many divisions in our politics. But when it comes to how harmful the impact of big tech companies is, I think it’s bipartisan.

Voters are on the sidelines, “Let’s pull the reins. It’s too much. We have to control it now. ” I have a feeling that we are going to see a lot more changes and more laws from the states and will not wait for the federal government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.