Refusing to judge Trump is a political act

It is a sacred principle of democracy that the judicial and prosecutorial processes must be free from political pressure. These decisions should be made as purposefully as possible.

So let me tell you further: I hope no one in the judiciary will make a decision based on this article. But similarly, nothing should be done on the basis of threats from their Republicans or pressure from moderate politicians to “look ahead and not back down” to avoid political violence, conservative reaction, or anything else. The DOJ should take the law and the information where it leads.

If the information warrants for the trial of Donald Trump and anyone in his circle, they should be prosecuted. Their judgment will not be political. Will fail to judge them.

Unfortunately, Republican elected officials are making heavy threats to both the DOJ and Democrats, insisting that the January 6 (or some other) trial against Trump will be seen as a political act – and they will take revenge. Their outrage was specifically directed at the House House Jan. 6 committee, which concluded that there was sufficient evidence to implicate Trump and several of his associates in serious crimes.

The House Committee and DOJ officials should study these threats for a variety of reasons.

First and foremost, democracy cannot improve if the crimes are not punished because their trials will be interpreted as political, especially by those responsible who are responsible. The result of this exercise will be a devastating increase: elected officials will commit even greater and more daring crimes to win and retain power, knowing that their opponents can do nothing about whether they succeed or fail.

Second, Republicans themselves have blocked the normal accountability process under the Constitution from appealing to Trump. They have done it for political reasons, from notoriety to cowardice. The GOP rejected the offer when Republicans threatened to cut off arms from Ukraine in exchange for trapping Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in exchange for trapping his internal political opponent, Joe Biden, for the high crime. Republicans had the opportunity to convict Trump for the high crime of leading a coup attempt on January 6, 2021, and to prevent him from seeking the presidency again. They refused again. It is worth noting that a congressional inquiry into the former president and his advisers was an unpleasant political act while it was a Republican political act that undermined the constitutional process of accountability, such as impeachment.

Third, the threat posed by these Republicans is ridiculous. “Lock him up!” It’s more than just fun to watch the party. Slogan and endless Benghazi hearing allegations of political cases. Trump considered the judiciary and the attorney general as his personal attorneys, and has made numerous attempts to use federal law enforcement to support his own ambitions.

But there is a deeper question as to why Attorney General Merrick Garland and the DJ did not file a lawsuit against Trump. No one in the department speaks on the record, but there are only two possible answers – none of which are satisfactory.

It is Possible Prosecutors do not believe there is enough evidence to convince the jury of his crimes against Trump. I’m not a lawyer, but it seems a bit hard to believe.

Obviously, At first glance Evidence that Trump has obstructed justice in Robert Mueller’s investigation. More than 1,000 former prosecutors have signed a letter stating that “President Trump’s conduct, as described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, in the case of another person who is not covered by the legal advisory policy against the incumbent, results in criminal charges for obstructing multiple trials.” Senior M মller Investigative Prosecutor Andrew Weissman has strongly argued that Trump should be tried for obstruction. There is a reason that obstruction is a crime: if you successfully intervene, you will never be convicted.

There is ample evidence that Trump has committed other crimes, ranging from campaign money violations to hatch act violations to classification laws and violations of the President’s Records Act. If Trump is not held accountable, why would any future president obey this or any other law?

Probably prosecutors think there is not enough evidence to show that Trump knew he had lost the election. Perhaps they think that Trump has a reasonable reason to refuse to send his people to loot and threaten Congress that day.

The second possibility is that the judiciary did not file a lawsuit against Trump due to political pressure. Again, this is speculation. But if Garland succumbs to internal or external pressure to avoid blaming Trump for the civil war, or Appearance For political motives, this would be a serious mistake – not prosecutorial prudence but prosecution negligence. It would be a grave injustice to allow the prosecution to derail the fear of violent retaliation.

If the crimes are obvious, then Failed Judging is a politically motivated act. Democracy cannot work if politicians are free to commit major crimes because their political allies can be held accountable. The report that the Manhattan district attorney basically dropped the lawsuit against Trump underscores how quickly a criminal case can be delayed due to a lack of will. One can only hope that Garland will not falter and is using the time he is taking to sharpen his case, not to worry about whether it will bring.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.